Grant Writer

Restricted funding, found, written and reported on time.

Your Grant Writer looks for funders whose stated priorities genuinely match the work you already do, and tells you early when one does not. Chasing a poor fit is the most expensive thing in grant seeking, and most of it happens because nobody scored the match before writing.

It works backward from the deadline. Every funder date gets a schedule behind it: when internal review has to happen, when the signature is needed, when the portal registration expires. You hear about the schedule while there is still time to meet it, not the night before.

The budget and the narrative agree. A reviewer who finds a position in your budget that your program description never mentions has found a reason to ask a question, and a question is a delay. This employee builds the two together and checks them against each other before anything is submitted.

It writes what you can actually deliver. A proposal that promises a new site or a cash match you have not agreed to is a problem you inherit for two years. Anything that commits the organization to something new comes to you as a decision before it is written, not after it is won.

Reports get filed. The report eighteen months after the award decides whether that funder gives again, and it is the thing that slips when everyone is busy. Every award's reporting dates are tracked from the day it lands, and the narrative is drafted from your program's own numbers.

Once a month you get one page: what went out, what came back, what was declined, and what the declines have in common.